Cervix Day Of Menstruation

New Directive 2011 What's Up, Doc? Part I

In April 2011 approved the new guidelines of the National Public Investment System (Directive No. 001-2011-EF/68.01) by Resolution N º 003-2011-EF / 6 8.01. This policy also to influence the wording change (now is more explicit) is the main change to "suppress" (so to speak) the pre-feasibility stage according to the directive although this stage is included in the formulation stage of the profile.

present a quick analysis

The article states that the 8 th Schedule of Investment Offices OPI now expressly adopt the Terms of Reference TDR when UF hired formula unit preparing pre-investment studies. The TOR should be prepared by the UF to be responsible for the content of these these studies. They must also develop the work plan when preparing pre-investment studies to be conducted by UF's own, which must also be approved by the IPO in accordance with § 9.

Despite being healthy this development and approval including of TDRs in fact much depended on the technical capacity to develop a TDR UF fulfill its proper function.
The TOR are vital documents that allow a good quality of the projects. Often confused the development of this important document with a document TDR but ends up being a copy & paste (copy and paste) of similar documents prepared by technical staff or "agile" than just a TDR unworthy and starting from that moment tendency to get a bad product.
also hope that this new round flow of TDRs from UF to IPOs and vice versa, for the development and adoption, do not end up extending the beginning of the formulation of PIPs not to say that the cure was worse than the disease.
The main idea here is to do well on a TDR.

The paragraph 9.2 of Article 9 º increases as the responsibility of verifying UF appropriate legal or physical healing respective institutional arrangements for implementation of PIP, to ensure the sustainability of the PIP before joining the Bank Project. In the case of regional governments or local governments, the UF should check the geographical location of the PIP and its correspondence to its territorial jurisdiction, except in the case of a PIP-wide inter-municipal or influence.

We believe that this addition is unnecessary because this should be clarified in the TOR prior to formulation of a PIP. Honestly, at this point, more than 8 years of the SNIP, we do not believe that policy (internal or external) have not noticed these important points in the formulation of a PIP. The art

10 th of roles and responsibilities of the Implementation Unit EU has clarified the first stage of the investment phase specifying the development of definitive studies, technical documents or other equivalent documents.

Prior to this clarification, this article only repaired in "technical documents" normally used for infrastructure projects confusing document social projects for example. Moreover, we now know that depending on the type of PIP, this may require the development of a more technical file an environmental impact study done in a whole definitive studies. Or, in some cases, requiring an Operational Plan (as definitive study) is not necessarily a technical file and can include environmental considerations.
not forget that since the entry into force of the National Environmental Impact Assessment Sinei SNIP PIPs are within this system and must meet the standards around Sinei.

continue talking about this new directive, meanwhile, takes a look:

Directive No. 001-2011-EF/68.01

By: Dante Garcia Jimenez